Google Glass Vs HoloLens
Google Glass and HoloLens are two wearable computer technologies that allow you to step into a virtual world and interact with it through voice commands. Unlike HoloLens, which uses basic head and finger movements, Google Glass is built to react to the user's voice. This makes it possible to have a more natural interaction with the virtual world than you might otherwise have. But which is better for your lifestyle?
The differences between the HoloLens and Google Glass are vast, but they do have one thing in common: both are augmented reality devices. HoloLens leverages eye movement and gestures, while Google Glass relies on voice commands to navigate and perform tasks. Despite their similarities, the HoloLens has a few significant limitations that make them unsuitable for everyday use.
Microsoft Hololens uses see-through holographic lenses that can display holograms on top of real world objects. The device has four built-in cameras that analyze movement and define real-world surfaces and spaces. The cameras enable the device to accurately position virtual holograms in real world space and recognize gestures. Microsoft is still working on the software to enable the device for the general public, but it is an early stage product.
Although HoloLens is based on augmented reality, Google Glass is geared towards the consumer market. Because it is expensive, consumers were hesitant to purchase it. Moreover, the limited number of use cases made it difficult to justify its price tag. Privacy concerns also impeded the adoption of Google Glass. Since the devices are equipped with cameras, conversations are recorded. The device's design, poor battery life, and marketing were other issues that hindered its widespread use.
The main difference between Google Glass and Hololens lies in the eyepiece. The HoloLens has a dark tinted eyepiece while Google Glass has a clear eyepiece. In addition, HoloLens is intended for more sophisticated computing. Wearers can play video games and explore virtual holographic worlds. Those who opt for Google Glass have to be more comfortable and practical.
Comparing Microsoft's HoloLens to Google Glass, one might ask how each differs from the other. One thing that sets HoloLens apart from Google Glass is its Kinetic technology. This technology produces a 3D model of the user and the room he/she is in. The user then selects the location of the virtual screen and the device maintains its position within the 3D space.
The design of the Google Glass is characterized by its lekki appearance and its ability to be worn on the okulary, whereas the HoloLens is bulkier and thicker than Google Glass. It has a headband that wraps around your head and a chunky fighter pilot goggles-like eye section. In a nutshell, both headsets are great for working out in the real world, but there are significant differences between them.
Google Glass lacked some key features that would have made it useful for work. For example, while it was largely intended for hands-free interaction in the workplace, users couldn't always see the actions of the other person. This created a number of ethical issues. HoloLens' camera was a limiting factor, and people were not ready for it. Microsoft also aimed the HoloLens more at the enterprise, with a wide variety of applications ranging from remote communication to training for employees. The potential for HoloLens is far greater than for personal use.
As for Microsoft, its HoloLens needs to prove a need in everyday life. The wearables market is already flooded with wristbands, smartphones, and smart eyewear. If Microsoft can convince even half of these consumers to purchase the HoloLens, it'll have a much better chance of making the device a hit. With a great product like the Surface, Microsoft's marketing efforts won't have as much trouble selling it to consumers.
The main difference between Google Glass and Microsoft's HoloLens is that the former is designed to project Web-based information onto the wearer's single eye while the latter has a see-through display and creates 3D images. Google Glass is more of a mobile version of the internet, but HoloLens offers the convenience of a full-fledged browser with an invisible 3D representation of space.
The Oculus Rift and Google Glass have quite a few things in common, and it's easy to read their acquisition as Facebook's middle finger to their competition. Both companies have been missing the social boat in recent years, and are competing to take over your mind. Google is using augmented reality to make the technology unobtrusive, while Facebook is trying to make it immersive and stay relevant. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, but one may become mainstream before the other.
Google Glass is an example of the latter, which has many features that the Oculus Rift doesn't. While the Oculus Rift is smaller, it has a larger screen than the Google Glass. While both headsets are augmented reality, Google Glass is more like a smartphone that delivers everything directly to the eyes. Google Glass also has some other benefits, including video recording and access to email and web information. Both devices connect to the user's smartphone wirelessly. The Oculus Rift has a 960x1,080 OLED display that has a sharper, clearer image than a typical smartphone or tablet. The Google Glass display, however, is a bit smaller than a smartphone but can easily be read even from a distance.
Oculus Rift aims to deliver a heavy dose of escapism by delivering an immersive environment. The virtual reality headset has a single screen, but compatible software splits the picture into three dimensions that are rendered side by side. The virtual reality headset's circular lens works well with the Rift's lens. In addition to the Oculus Rift, Oculus also plans to release an updated version that promises 1080p resolution and improved head tracking. The update may even be wireless.
While both VR headsets are designed to help people experience the virtual world, there are some problems that can derail the consumer enthusiasm for these devices. While virtual reality games are generally playable online with friends, VR headsets are very solitary in person. People can't share the experience with others and don't know how to socialize in a group. Thus, VR headsets will likely have a small market. Google Glass and Oculus Rift are two examples of wearable devices that may become mainstream in the future.
Google Glass Enterprise Edition 2
Both the Google Glass Enterprise Edition 2 and the HoloLens are augmented reality devices, but they offer distinct differences. While HoloLens is designed to be more powerful than Google Glass, it is also bulky, large, and distracting. While the former's touchscreen is functional, Google Glass is designed to provide information to the user in the easiest way possible without distracting them. However, it also suffers from a number of problems that make it unsuitable for business use.
The M-Series product line boasts high-performance components, including 6GB of RAM, 64GB of storage capacity, and a 12.8-megapixel camera that supports optical image stabilization. The device is water-resistant and limits dust ingress. The M-Series product line supports easy content development, and it's equipped with the Unity game engine, which is a popular 3D content development platform. The M-Series features a 720p display, a 3350mAh battery, and a USB-C port. The M-Series also offers multiple noise-canceling microphones, GPS capabilities, and a built-in flashlight.
While the HoloLens and the Glass Enterprise Edition are both capable of being worn as a full-fledged MR headset, the former is much more appealing to developers. The Google Glass Enterprise Edition 2 runs on the open-source Android platform, which is advantageous for developers. Microsoft has also opened its enterprise Glass program to a wider range of companies. While HoloLens may have the edge in terms of hardware, Google's glass version is much closer to a fully-fledged computer.
The main differences between Google Glass and the HoloLens lie in the way they're used. Google Glass is a hands-free experience that allows workers to focus on tasks without distractions. Moreover, the device enables employees to access instructions, quality assurance checklists, and training videos. It also enables employees to collaborate with remote employees. Ultimately, Google Glass is better than HoloLens for the business world. It promises to improve worker safety, but it may curtail peripheral vision.
Related PostsGoogle Glass Apps
Price of Google Glass 2 Enterprise Edition 2